Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

£1-a-night tourist levy will drive vital business from Highlands, say firms

Amanda Frazer of the FSB and a Newtonmore B&B owner who is against the proposes 'Tourist Tax'.
Amanda Frazer of the FSB and a Newtonmore B&B owner who is against the proposes 'Tourist Tax'.

Research by the Federation of Small Business (FSB) has revealed that 73% of Highland businesses oppose the introduction of a potential £10 million-a year tourist tax in the region.

And three-quarters of the 253 businesses surveyed across the north also said the introduction of the levy – possibly at £1-a-night per bed – would have a damaging impact on other local businesses and economies.

Business owners say that a tourist tax on top of already high 20% VAT rates on hotel accommodation would push visitors elsewhere, while council leaders say it is a logical option to raise revenue for services and infrastructure to cope with rising visitor numbers.

But Amanda Frazer, FSB’s Highlands and Islands leader, said the strength of opposition should come as a “wake-up call” to Highland Council and the Scottish Government, and that taxing visitors to “shore up budgets” will threaten the existence of communities which depend on them.

She said: “Passions are running high, and rightly so, because a new Highland tourism tax is bad for business, bad for local Highland economies, and bad for communities.

“Tourism happens to be on the up at the moment, but tourists are notoriously fickle and easy come, easy go. If they feel that they are receiving poor value for money thanks to all the tax they have to pay, social media and word-of-mouth will ensure that this damaging message spreads like wildfire.”

Local authorities currently do not have the power to introduce a tourist tax – and establishing such a power would require an act of the Scottish Parliament.

However in Edinburgh, which the FSB survey revealed has similar levels of opposition, the council is pressing ahead with a “business case” for its introduction. Visitor numbers during the busier months of August and December are a particular problem in the capital.

The FSB argue that a tourist tax works in other European countries where there are reduced VAT rates on hotel accommodation.

Ms Frazer said that, post Brexit, it is vital that the north’s key sectors can compete on the world stage on quality, price and value for money, especially if they want to tap into the growing Chinese market.

She said the local authority should instead be calling for more money from the Scottish Government for improving transport, digital infrastructure and housing, and to help retain young people in rural areas.

Highlands and Islands MSP Edward Mountain (Scottish Conservatives) said: “Placing a ‘tourism tax’ on accommodation in the Highlands would only be detrimental and would probably make visitors reconsider their destination.”

Last night, Highland Council leader Margaret Davidson said she would welcome discussions with business groups about some “strong targeted lobbying” to seek reductions in VAT and rates.

In December, a report produced by the local authority’s director of development and infrastructure, Stuart Black, said a £1-a-night levy on tourists staying at hotels across the north would raise £10 million a year for infrastructure.

The report stated that visitor numbers to the Highlands soared by 18% to 6.1 million between 2012 and 2016, with the economic impact rising by 34% to £1.2 billion.

The council’s vice convener Allan Henderson, co-chairman of a new Tourism Working Group, said he can understand the FSB’s position and admitted he at one point was opposed to the tourist tax concept. But he added: “A levy such as this allied to the Rural Tourism Infrastructure Fund (£6 million government fund) could transform how we treat our visitors who generally appreciate the green credentials of the Highlands.”

He says that with “clear articulation” to tourists that they would be contributing to the infrastructure of the Highlands, as opposed to clogging up roads and glens, it would ensure they left the Highlands with a “renewed sense of pride”.

FSB conducted its survey with businesseses with the support of Visit Loch Ness, SkyeConnect, Visit Wester Ross, Venture North and Discover Glencoe.

Types of businesses surveyed ranged from those in hospitality to financial services and manufacturing, retail and agriculture, forestry and fishing.

A Scottish Government spokesman said there are no plans to introduce a visitor levy on the tourism sector, stressing that it is already subject to the second highest VAT rates in Europe under the UK Government

The spokesman added that they continue to “deliver a fair deal” to councils, with revenue and capital funding increasing in real terms in the next financial year.